Sunday, December 2, 2018

Trying to be a less racist teacher

I had a moment several years ago where I was reading about a terrorist attack where someone had shot and killed people and based on the race of the shooter media had begun reporting about mental illness.  Reading the response immediately brought to mind that I had done the exact same thing when I was a new teacher at my first teaching job. I had had a white student go on a swearing rampage and storm out of the classroom.  I remember thinking that he had lost control of his emotions. Later in the year a black student had a similar although lesser violation. This time I asked two other teachers what I should do in response and they both told me to write a referral.  I did and when I talked to the student he literally told me what I was doing was wrong. And his rationale bounced right off of my dense head. No I thought, I can’t be racist I thought. I’m a good person, I’m a teacher. I asked two other teachers.  The other student was different because they had a documented issue. I dismissed his comments and followed through. In retrospect, this student was probably used to getting the short end of the stick and this was a common experience for him. And I had no idea until years later that I had been in the wrong.  
Since then I’ve been working at trying to make sure that I would not fail another student because of their race and also trying to elevate talented students that get overlooked because of their race.  It has been a surprisingly uneven journey were I have learned a lot but often at the expense of my students. When I messed up I would always try to apologize and reflect on what I should have done instead.  Here are some lessons that I’ve learned to this point.

1.  We often present racism as something that black people need to fix instead of white people.  In the above scenario I am the racist. I had no ill intentions and if I could do something to fix what I did I would in a heartbeat.  I feel awful about it. But instead of recognizing our own role we tend to shift race onto minorities and onto students instead of white people.  I was confusing not being a bigot with being unable to be racist. And that confusion is common and it is very counter productive. I was the one with the problem and I missed that because of my ignorance.

2.  Everyone is racist.  It’s not a binary system where you’re racist or you are not racist.  It’s a spectrum like autism and everyone is somewhere on the spectrum.  One of our biggest problems is that people confuse racism with bigotry. Being a bigot means that you don’t like a person because of their identity.  Being racist means that you contribute to the construction of racial structures where people of a minority group become linked with no evidence or rationale.  This happens frequently. We all do this. When a student is loud they are being disruptive but when a black student is loud they are being loud because they are black.  Teachers tend to notice the black students being loud even if the decibel levels are comparable.
A racist comment I read once was a lady saying that she isn’t racist and she makes sure to teach her children to treat everyone equally.  This doesn’t come off as racist to many people but it is because what the person is doing is reinforcing the idea that black people are all one group.  She’s not telling her kids we treat everyone equally when something arises with white people, only when black people are involved does this phrase manifest.  That distinction causes black people to become linked when they are just individual people. The reality is the more you ignore race the larger your racism impact becomes for most people.  

3.  There are methods to be less racist or more anti-racist.  The biggest thing that I’ve learned to do is to always pause.  Your brain uses two systems to work, one is automatic and the other involves thinking.  If you have positive intentions but negative impacts, it’s frequently due to automation.  So when you are about to discipline a student, you need to pause and determine if this is an automated trained response where you are being unfair or if this is a reasonable course of action.  In order for this to work you have to be honest with yourself and for many that is a challenge.
My favorite compliment I ever received was at conferences a parent had come in even though their child was doing very well in the course.  She just wanted to let me know that her daughter had told her that in every class she took she always felt like the “muslim girl” but in my class she was just a normal kid.  This should be one of our primary goals. Our students are not free in our schools to be themselves. We should be looking for opportunities for our students to be free from their race and this doesn’t come about by ignoring race.  This also doesn’t come about by treating racial disparities as a problem for black students and not for white students.
A good way to improve your thinking is to try hard to analyze white people for a length of time.  Every time you talk to a white student try and pause and evaluate if you are doing so differently because of their race.  Are you asking them a harder question that requires more independence because they are white? Are you asking them about academics or social things instead of athletics because they are white?  Were you standing closer in proximity to them because they are white? At first it is very odd, but I think we secretly do this for black students and that differentiation is perceived by the student whether the teacher is aware they are doing it or not.  And it makes an impact. If you’re skeptical you can start by taking an IAT here.  
Becoming less racist is not something you can accomplish without effort.  But if minimal effort is the best you can do, listen to other people who speak honestly about it.  If you can find someone to follow on twitter, or read a book about race. Without critically thinking and reflecting you’re unlikely to change enough but do something.  

4.   We don’t listen well.  I had gone to a professional development session.  It was for white women to talk about their role in racism under the pretense that white women often escalate tensions as men feel a need to protect them.  I didn’t want to intrude on the session so I decided to go, but sit in the back and not comment the entire time. During the session as people offered up ideas and comments one of our black teachers started to talk about our district.  My ears perked up. This is exactly what I wanted. I wanted the expertise of someone who lives this every day. We don’t have a lot of black teachers and so not only does she have her own experiences but also a lot of black students confide and trust in her so she is incredibly knowledgeable.  And yet the second she finished speaking another teacher said that they disagreed and they felt that we were doing a great job with race. Another teacher confirmed this and I watched the room completely miss what was said. Later I was at a different PD session and a black professor from Michigan State was working with us to help us. A teacher asked the most inane question and he was so patient with her. When she first spoke I felt the urge to chastise the question but instead he listened to her, met her where she was and tried to help her in spite of her question being what I considered to be dismissive of his efforts.
I hear a lot of teachers claim that students play the race card to get out of trouble but the evidence I see would make this incredibly rare.  And that doesn’t mean that you won’t be supported by others in your claim it just means that you are likely wrong. As a teacher I watch white students perform infractions constantly and get away with them.  I listen as administrators tell me about parents who obstruct discipline for their white children in spite of clear evidence of rule violations. But our perspective is the opposite and that is dangerous. If you don’t know the statistics but assume they benefit black students you are wrong and contributing to a racist narrative.  


5.   We are too comfortable with our racial disparities.  If white students started to achieve less than black students we would work tirelessly to make sure we were being fair.  When black students struggle we consider this the norm and make ceremonial efforts at mitigating the damage. Part of this arises because people think that they are special and that others are the problem.  But we all share this burden and it’s time we put together a more concerted effort. Psychological evidence shows that teacher expectations have a massive impact on achievement. We know of the study where random students were given a gifted label and then outperformed their peers.  We know of the blue eyes, brown eyes study. And yet when we see these same results in our classrooms with consistency we can’t reflect on what we do to contribute to the problem.
One of the solutions is that each teacher needs to think hard and reflect and work on being more anti-racism and less racist.  The other is that we need teachers to anticipate that students are going to come with deficits and have a plan to help students achieve even if they start out behind.  As a chemistry teacher lots of my black students struggle and there are methods for them to still be successful if I put in the effort to give them opportunities to catch up.  But if I give a math pre-test on day 1 to scare struggling students out of the class to make my job easier then that’s not going to happen. If I don’t give students current cognitive research strategies and instead tell them they need to work harder or study more when they’re scrambling to keep up as it is they aren’t going to be successful.  It’s not your job to set out a set of parameters that negatively impact one racial group over the other. It’s your job to figure out methodologies that allow students to succeed. And it will take more effort to do that and it is worth the effort to do so. When you tell 9th graders that in order to be a chemistry student you need to have done X by the time you were fourteen years old the students you are most often restricting are black students who may very well be on a path to being a chemist but need more time to get there.    
But a huge part of your job that also is important is that we need to not have students going into teaching (or other professions for that manner) without a strong understanding of race and racism.  There were people who could have taught me about racism before I failed that student and they didn’t. I think that I would have been receptive to the conversation even if it was critical but I never got the chance and someone else paid the price for that.  We need our white students to not leave school thinking that diversity doesn’t apply to them. We had a professional development session once and the speaker asked us to name white people that had been supportive of civil rights for black people. I knew of none and I knew that I was not on a path to be on that list in the future.  We teach that white people are the cause of racism but not the solution and shifting that focus goes a long way towards being successful at reducing racism towards our children.

Friday, November 2, 2018

Classroom Learning Thoughts

Weekly thoughts to consider about learning, thinking and academics that will continue to be updated throughout the year.
1. Getting an answer correct doesn’t mean you understand something, getting an answer wrong doesn’t mean that you don’t understand something
2. Our goal in discussion is not for 1 of you to say the right answer or give the correct explanation.  Our goals are to have as many of you think and have as many of you communicate your thinking as possible.  
3. Trying to do a problem you don’t know how to solve is one of the best ways to learn new information for retention and understanding.  Mimicking a sample problem removes much of the learning opportunities for new problems.
4. Your grade in chemistry class should reflect how much chemistry you understand, how well you can communicate your understanding and nothing else.
5. Chunking is the difference between smart and not smart, being able to chunk more information makes you able to learn more and faster.  If you feel not smart, start trying to accumulate more and more chunks.
6. Don’t try to achieve a lot by scamming your way through life, it’s unhealthy, learn and be awesome as much as possible
7. 2 concrete examples help analyze and learn abstract ideas. Good students produce the second example when the teacher omits it.

Thursday, October 25, 2018

A Conference with Mr. Milam

If you are unable to attend conferences for any reason here is an excessive amount of information that gets conveyed during conferences:
Chemistry
Philosophies of the class
The typical progression of a unit in chemistry starts with gathering data and experimental evidence.  That evidence is compiled on a whiteboard and discussed in a large group. From that discussion students construct new ideas while improving their previous knowledge about the topic being studied.  We do a lot of thinking at the particle level for what is happening. These two videos (1 and 2) reflect a lot of how I attempt to teach.  


How grading works
I try to make the grade reflect what the students understand and can communicate about chemistry.  I also try to make the grades flexible in timing so that students can have multiple opportunities to assess on a topic.  At the end of a unit students are given a set of standards that describe what I will be assessing their understanding of.  The tests are questions designed to determine how well students understand that standard. A score from 1-4 is assigned for each standard.  Students can often reassess on standards that they are not pleased with their initial score. A 4 is a quality answer that demonstrates understanding and communicates well.  A 3 score is a good answer but missing small but critical details, makes a minor mistake or has communication issues. A 2 score is incorrect or explained incorrectly. A 1 score is way off or completely incorrect.  
 
Resources for students
Class Website (has standards under each unit, help videos, worksheets, extra practice)
Twitter hashtag (you don’t need a twitter account to find this #michichem19)


How to do well in the class
The best way to do well in chemistry is to focus on class time.  Every day should involve learning and reflection and the best learning possible is in class.  
If struggling, the initial response should be to look at what is going on during class.  Are notes being taken? Are you thinking during class? Are you reflecting on what we learned in class?  If class is too fast paced, then I recommend preparing for class by looking ahead on the website and reflecting on class by comparing notes with the standards.  Reflection should involve predicting what questions are expected and preparing quality answers to those questions.
Things that I find ineffective would be reading the textbook, watching Khan Academy style videos and doing large amounts of practice problems*.  
Retrieval Practice is one of the best ways to study and prepare for tests.  It can reduce test anxiety, improve performance and is backed by a large amount of cognitive science research.  Please help replace outlining, highlighting and reading notes with retrieval practice.


*Doing a lot of practice problems is about transferring knowledge into automated thinking systems.  Most of our assessments do not test this but occasionally there are a few concepts that are helpful to do this.  
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is there no grade for a B?
The standard grades are 1, 2, 3 and 4.  For each standard there is no grade but the combination of scores can result in a B.  The scaling from 1-4 is an improvement over most tests where questions are either 0 or 100% and the final grade is a compilation of right and wrong only.  


Do you recommend using the textbook?
I do not find textbooks to be helpful in this course.  It can be used as a resource but we do not follow along the order for most subjects and the textbook is not designed to lead to deep thinking that is critical to do well on the assessments.  


Should we get a tutor?
It can be helpful, but I think it is more valuable for students to focus on their time in class rather than trying to hear something simple to avoid thinking.  All students have sufficient resources during class to do well.


What class should we take next year?
I strongly recommend everyone takes AP chemistry or IB chemistry HL.  If you are good at chemistry it is a rare talent. If you need more practice high school is the best place to get help since college chemistry is much faster paced with less instructional pedagogy.  


What is the difference between AP and IB chemistry and which is better?
I’ve taught both and I love both classes.  The biggest difference I found was that AP chemistry moves faster.  IB chemistry covers about 40% more material in double the time. So the learning expectations are higher in IB while AP allows a second course to be taken.  I really like both classes though because they fill in a lot of gaps from chemistry. Many students can do most of chemistry, but feel insecure because they sense there is missing information.  They are correct and a lot of that missing information comes in AP and IB chemistry.


Why did I do worse on test ____ than test _____ or standard ____ than standard _____?
The standards are not all the same difficulty.  A 3 score on one standard might be a good score because of the difficulty.  A score of 3 on another might be bad because of the simplicity. The tests have varying score averages and so trying harder might not show immediate improvements while slacking off might not show immediate plummeting of scores.  


When are reassessments?
About once a week either after school, before school or during lunch.  The schedule varies so that if someone cannot make one they can do the next one hopefully.  If you love reassessments consider asking for a testing center investment for open use by all students so that even more reassessments could happen!


Can I reassess more than once?
Time permitting, definitely.  I just ask you try to improve your knowledge/reflect before reassessing so it doesn’t waste my time and yours.  


Is there really not homework or is my child lying?
I rarely assign homework (maybe once a month but sometimes less than that).  There is studying expected at times but we aim to do our learning during class and respect your time after school to do other things.  


Is there anything extra my child that loves chemistry can do?  
If they take IB chemistry HL or AP chemistry I strongly recommend working on Chemistry Olympiad.  The top students from the region win $150 and get to take a brutally challenging 6 hour chemistry test and if they qualify attend a 2 week training camp to qualify for the four students that represent the USA in the International Chemistry Olympiad.  I also find this twitter account really cool and recommend books #3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 from this list.  


How can we get more 4s and fewer 3s?  
Focus during class, participate during whiteboarding/discussion, take notes during discussion, reflect after discussions, think a lot, prepare responses for anticipated test questions, use retrieval practice, explain things with fewer vocabulary terms to show complete understanding.  


How can we get more 3s and fewer 2s?
Have more confidence, participate more in class, write out what you think more frequently and then as you write learn to evaluate what you know and do not yet understand, pay attention to key ideas from experiments and discussion and write those ideas down so you remember to highlight them on tests, use videos with extra practice problems, think a lot, try and figure out what things you know and use those to build new ideas, explain things you are learning about to someone else.  


Is it true that Mr. Milam said something hilarious in class?
No.  I never say anything funny in class and remember that most high school students are probably lying.  

IB Chemistry HL
Philosophies of the class
I have two principal goals in this course, to teach as much high level chemistry as possible and to prepare for the IB chemistry HL exam.  


How grading works
Currently grades are 70% test scores and 30% homework and labs.  The homework and lab grade is expected to be near 100% for all students.   Homework that is marked below a 100% can be fixed for full points unless the assignment is turned in late.  
Tests are curved to adjust for the IB scale.  The score is converted to a percent, that percent is square rooted and multiplied by 10 (IE a 64/100 becomes an 80%, 49/100 becomes a 70%).  We are currently exploring reassessments in IB but it is a work in process.


Resources for the class
The website has a lot of helpful materials.  I wrote a textbook that is split up by chapter in a google doc so that students can make a copy and edit as they please.  Notes for each unit are available and a lot of instructional videos, practice problems with video solutions and flashcards are posted.  
Our class twitter hashtag is #IBchemHL1
Our reflections will be in threads under #IBchemHL1 #reflection
Textbook - I’m not a fan of textbooks in general but the IB textbook walks a thin line of ethics where the phrasing used in the textbook mirrors the markschemes of the exams.  The textbook can be helpful at improving test scores and is recommended for use.


How to do well in the class
Think hard, explain your thinking and reflect.  
Keep your homework grade as close to 100% as possible.  Use the syllabus to reflect on what you do and do not understand.  
Try and learn 2 new things every time we review a test.  
Continue learning even when topics are challenging and frustrating.  The last 2-5 months things really come together because it is easier to learn when you know a bit of everything.  
Form a pair with another student and practice explaining things to each other and quizzing each other where you use retrieval practice.
Tutor a student in chemistry to focus your chemistry basics.  
Spend a lot of effort on your reflections and then keep them to review your original thoughts as you learn new topics.  
Find connections between topics.  
If class is too fast look ahead and prepare for class.  


Frequently Asked Questions
Is there anything extra my child that loves chemistry can do?  
If they take IB chemistry HL or AP chemistry I strongly recommend working on Chemistry Olympiad.  The top students from the region win $150 and get to take a brutally challenging 6 hour chemistry test and if they qualify attend a 2 week training camp to qualify for the four students that represent the USA in the International Chemistry Olympiad.  I also find this twitter account really cool and recommend books #3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9 from this list.  


What is an IA (internal assessment)?
Students in IB chemistry HL have to design their own personal high level chemistry experiment, do the experiment and write a report that gets turned into IB and counts toward their IB score.  


What is a group 4 project?
All students in the Diploma Program do a group 4 project where the entire group gets together and does something that connects the fields of science (physics, chemistry, biology).  Last year students studied adhesives and the year before international cuisine.


What should IB students do the summer of their junior year entering into senior year?
THEIR EXTENDED ESSAY!!!!!!!!!  Get the rough draft done by the end of summer and your lives will be much better.  Please!


What is a good IB score?
Generally speaking if a student gets a 4 score on all classes they will get their diploma as long as CAS/EE pass.  If a student has 3 HL classes they need 12 HL points. So if they get a 3 in IB Chem HL, they would need a 5 in another HL course to balance.  I think with a 2 in an HL course there is a separate set of requirements.
About half of the students that get a 3 in chem HL get the diploma and I think every student that got a 4 or higher in chem got the diploma.  


What is a perk to IB chemistry HL?
Learning organic chemistry in advance of college is wonderful.  Organic chemistry is very challenging and we learn a large portion of organic 1 and a small amount of organic 2.  That is a huge leg up for a weeder course for medical school. We also learn some basic NMR, IR and MS.


Are there really well sung IB chemistry review songs that are also Disney parodies?
Maybe.


Is it true that Mr. Milam said something hilarious in class?

No.  I never say anything funny in class and remember that most high school students are probably lying.  

Thursday, July 5, 2018

Effect of modeling pedagogy on IB Chemistry HL scores

Three years ago was a very busy time in my teaching career.  I had just attended a three week long workshop on teaching chemistry using modeling pedagogy.  I walked away ready to completely overhaul my teaching methods and even institute standards based grading in my chemistry class.  At the same time I was teaching IB chemistry HL for the first time ever. I had a group of seniors in their second year and a group of juniors starting the course.  Today we received our third set of data and the 2018 group is our first group of students to have been taught using modeling pedagogy prior to taking IB Chemistry HL. The first two groups (2016, 2017) took chemistry prior to IB Chemistry HL, but they took chemistry before I had attended the workshop and were taught using traditional teaching methods.  
Figure 1: IB score distributions from 2016-2018
Figure 2:  IB average scores (3.96, 3.74 and 4.42) from 2016-2018


The data is limited because it only represents 25, 27 and 31 students for the three groups.  There is also likely variation in my teaching abilities as I have become more familiar with teaching IB Chemistry HL.  But the data does match my experiences while teaching the three groups. The modeling pedagogy increased the ability of the students to question the material we learned.  As the content became more difficult there was a presence of mind to push for evidence behind the conclusions I would present. While we did continue to use modeling teaching for some lessons (equilibrium, crystal field splitting) the biggest difference to me was the level of analysis that students applied in their learning was at a deeper level.  They made more connections between content areas, they were able to visualize systems at the particle level and change back to symbols quicker, they had more experience and context to learn in a more permanent fashion.  

None of these comments are an indictment on the first two groups.  All three cohorts of students had remarkably intelligent and successful students that did brilliant work in class.  They all had strong metacognition and did deep levels of analysis of chemistry. I also do not feel that I taught these first two groups poorly.  We did a lot of engaging activities and reflection for all three groups. The modeling approach in the chemistry prerequisite course I believe to have elevated the 3rd cohort to an improvement of that learning.  There is a frequent concern amongst teachers that altering teaching methods will lead to students not being prepared for the most challenging coursework that they will take in the future. While there is a lot of uncertainty and unreliability in the data in Figure 1 and Figure 2 based on student and teacher variation, there is evidence to support modeling having a positive impact on top students that move on to take a course such as IB Chemistry HL.  To get the IB Diploma students need to average a 4 score on their classes with a few technicalities mixed in. The % of students achieving a 4 or better improved from 52% to 59% to 68% over the three years. Many students that get a 3 in HL chemistry still get their diploma and students getting a 3 or better went from 80% to 93% to 93%. Our diploma rates for the three years were steady at 79%, 79% and 82%. It will be another two years before I have a group test as our program has grown and I now only teach every other cohort.

Update with 2020 scores:

Wednesday, May 30, 2018

A Tale of Two Teachers

It was the best of times.  It was the worst of times…..


Teaching is really hard the first few years.  I was good at about 20-30% of all of the components of teaching and a mess for the rest.  But when I would talk with other teachers, students, parents, administrators they would always focus on the things I did best.  I was exciting, gave good explanations, motivated students, had good relationships. They would avoid looking at the amount of student engagement I had, how I ran discipline, how I graded, what instructional methods I used.  And deep down I always knew that they didn’t see me at my worst moments. I knew that I was a fraud. When I switched schools teachers and students were less inclined to ignore my shortcomings. I was fraudulent and people were ready to let me know.  It was really hard going from a school where I felt valued and important to one where I felt like I was a disappointment and a joke. I was better at teaching by now and I was excellent at some parts of teaching, but I still had my weaknesses and I still knew about it.  It didn’t help getting pink slipped six times and while we all understand that getting laid off is usually not a personal attack, it still feels like that at times.


My first teaching job I was surrounded by great teachers that were constantly helping me get better, but I was the only chemistry teacher.  I lucked into meeting some all star teachers from around the area and I learned from them as much as I could. And gradually I got better. My weaknesses became areas to improve and my strengths became areas to share with other teachers.  Last year I ended up winning the award for Michigan Science Teacher of the Year. I was really excited, but I could not shake my feeling of being a fraud. I knew there were things I did well but I also was aware that there are so many teachers that are better than me and some by a wide margin.  I still had things that I didn’t do well. So I decided I was going to work really hard at improving until I didn’t feel that way anymore. The award gave me the confidence and the motivation to become worthy of the award I was given. I started really tracking what were the worst things I did and trying to improve them and trying to use my strengths more creatively and I am really proud to say that this year I was not a fraud.  I taught my heart out. I taught better than I have ever taught. From my methods to the results it was all there. And this all culminated in our IB senior banquet last night where I was able to watch my students that have been in my class for three consecutive years. They were amazing and I helped with that. I told my senior students today on their last day of high school, “It wasn’t perfect, but it was close enough.” It was a beautiful culmination that I will always remember fondly.


In Michigan our teachers are to be rated either ineffective, minimally effective, effective or highly effective. Our district laid out their criteria for what would constitute highly effective this year and my jaw dropped.  I hate our evaluation system. All evaluation systems have flaws but ours is particularly mean-spirited in my view. Our district started by saying that in order to achieve highly effective a teacher has to apply to go through a separate process with 5-8 observations instead of 2. There are extra goals, data analysis and teaching artifacts.  I put in my application first of all teachers in the district. I used a piece of flash cotton to simulate me putting my name into the Goblet of Fire when I turned in my form. Next our district requires that in order to get highly effective the teacher must be rated highly effective in all 22 components of the Charlotte Danielson rubric and never be observed at a level below highly effective in any of the 22 components during any of the observations.  This is of course impossible. Mr. Feeney, Mr. Keating and Jaime Escalante couldn’t do this if they team taught a single class of 12 students with five hours of prep time. It’s basically the equivalent of me telling my students that if they feel they’ll deserve an A they must apply and then if they get any question wrong ever in the semester that they will end up at a B.
I don’t know if I met the criteria in the original intent, but if not, I sure as heck went down swinging.  I spent time compiling all of my evidence that I had for my highly effective teaching for all twenty two criteria.  I met every single one of them. I did it. I matched the impossible and I feel great about my teaching this year.  It took so many different components of my teaching that I do well but I feel confident in my work that it is all there.  I was rated as effective. I am still fighting, but it is a battle I will lose. It feels like the school district is putting in writing for the entire world to see that I am a fraud.  I am not a fraud anymore and I deserve better than that. I didn’t in the past, but I do now. And I sit at lunch and I watch teachers that are far better than I am and they don’t apply and it makes me furious.  They are highly effective teachers and they don’t deserve to go through the miserable process that I went through. But they also do not deserve to choose between that and being disingenuous about their talents. They are highly effective teachers that are labelled at a lesser level than they are.  And why? Some of them are new and I see how much further ahead of the learning curve they are than I was at that point. And they should be encouraged by what they do. They are amazing, inspirational and wonderful and they deserve to know that and not be told otherwise. I don’t understand what we get from these evaluations that make them worth this.  


Sunday, May 27, 2018

It's time for a better evaluation system

Considerable time and effort are spent evaluating teachers without much to show for it.  Rarely does a teacher excel in teaching and credit their evaluation system for helping them to get where they are.  Evaluation systems rely on overworked administrators that nearly always end up accomplishing compliance rather than effective feedback, evaluation and improvement.  This causes the administrator to rely on a rubric that often is inappropriate. For example, our district uses the same rubric to evaluate my chemistry class as well as physical education, elementary, special education, etc.  The systems on these rubrics are most inappropriate because they evaluate the teacher and classroom environment relative to an expectation. The end goal is the initial evaluation.

I teach science using the modeling pedagogy.  The big philosophical difference between modeling and traditional teaching is that in traditional teaching the student is explained what the final objective or standard is and then this is repeated with variety as the student approaches that standard.  Modeling, in contrast, starts with where the student is. What is the current understanding of this concept and how can this student construct models from their understanding that are revised when the models fail or require change to explain discrepancies.  A big flaw in traditional learning is that by focusing on the final product in lieu of the status quo for the student we build concepts with lots of holes and misconceptions. In a constructivist approach students are more likely to identify and deconstruct these misconceptions.  

How can we shift teaching evaluations from a traditional model to a constructivist approach?  We need much more contact time with teachers. Administrators do not have the capability to accomplish this.  I have had some of the most talented administrators that I could have ever expected and yet I rarely see anything of value from my evaluations.  Instead we should create positions dedicated to evaluation and observation only. If a position was only spent meeting with teachers on prep periods, setting goals with teachers, observing teachers, giving feedback to teachers and connecting teachers the evaluation system improves dramatically.  This changes the evaluations from punitive to feedback and change focus from busy work and compliance to improvement and growth.

Teaching is very isolating.  Teachers are alone in their classrooms for the majority of their career.  Even when teachers meet with other teachers and do professional development it is very easy to continue doing the same things.  But having a quality teacher working with you is a tremendous advantage. An employee that does observations full time will get to experience the strengths of a school and will be able to connect teachers based on strengths, weaknesses and goals.  If a teacher wants to work on assessment, the evaluator will know who does assessment well and can facilitate connecting them. The larger amount of contact time also allows the evaluator to observe the teachers more frequently, more informally and also work on planning.  You would get better consistency by having fewer people doing evaluations and since they would spend more time with each teacher.

This would also open up some time for overworked administrators to spend less time fulfilling compliance requirements and instead have positive impacts on their staff and students.  Currently most administrators can spend their entire day answering emails, attending meetings and dealing with disciplinary infractions. By opening up their time they would be able to work on mentoring programs, developing professional development, being more visible in the school and whatever creative programs they desire to implement.